Ssi Cib
2011
 |
 ADD Curse of the Azure Bonds DOS SSI +CIB+ 1989 $19.95 Time Remaining: 10d 15h 25m Buy It Now for only: $19.95 |
 Dark Legions IBM PC +CIB+ SSI 1994 $19.95 Time Remaining: 10d 15h 25m Buy It Now for only: $19.95 |
 ADD Curse of the Azure Bonds SSI CIB 1989 PC $14.95 Time Remaining: 10d 15h 25m Buy It Now for only: $14.95 |
 ADD Treasures of the Savage Frontier IBM PC SSI CIB $29.95 Time Remaining: 10d 15h 25m Buy It Now for only: $29.95 |
 ADD Dark Queen of Krynn Macintosh SSI +CIB+1992 $29.99 Time Remaining: 10d 15h 25m Buy It Now for only: $29.99 |
 Phantasie Bonus Edition IBM PC SSI +CIB+ 1990 $39.95 Time Remaining: 10d 15h 25m Buy It Now for only: $39.95 |
 ADD Champions of Krynn IBM PC SSI +CIB+ 1990 $19.95 Time Remaining: 10d 15h 25m Buy It Now for only: $19.95 |
 ADD Death Knights of Krynn IBM PC SSI +CIB+ 1991 $24.95 Time Remaining: 10d 15h 25m Buy It Now for only: $24.95 |
 Red Lightning Commodore Amiga SSI +CIB+ 1989 $39.95 Time Remaining: 6d 19h 49m Buy It Now for only: $39.95 |
 ADD Curse of the Azure Bonds Macintosh SSI +CIB+ 1989 $49.95 Time Remaining: 6d 19h 49m Buy It Now for only: $49.95 |
 ADD Dragons of Flame IBM PC SSI +CIB+1989 $69.95 Time Remaining: 6d 19h 49m Buy It Now for only: $69.95 |
 Wizards Crown Apple II SSI +CIB+ 1986 Rare $129.95 Time Remaining: 6d 19h 49m Buy It Now for only: $129.95 |
Illegal to pose as an enlisted personnel in the U.S Army?
I saw a kid today (clearly not in the Army) wearing a full Uniform. Rank, SSI, name, branch, CIB, and Unit (4th ID). Of course this pissed me off, considering I'm in the Army. But the rank he waswearing was Specialist (E-4). Detestable, yes. But was he breaking the law?
If you're in the army, I'm sure you're familiar with 670-1. Specifically, paragraph 1-4 d:
"In accordance with chapter 45, section 771, title 10, United States Code (10 USC 771), no person except a
member of the U.S. Army may wear the uniform, or a distinctive part of the uniform of the U.S. Army unless
otherwise authorized by law. Additionally, no person except a member of the U.S. Army may wear a uniform, any part
of which is similar to a distinctive part of the U.S. Army uniform. This includes the distinctive uniforms and uniform
items listed in paragraph 1–12 of this regulation. Further, soldiers are not authorized to wear distinctive uniforms or
uniform items of the U.S. Army or of other U.S. Services with, or on civilian clothes, except as provided in chapters 27
through 30 of this regulation."
Paragraph 1-12 defines distinctive uniform items:
"a. The following uniform items are distinctive and will not be sold to or worn by unauthorized personnel:
(1) All Army headgear, when worn with insignia.
(2) Badges and tabs (identification, marksmanship, combat, and special skill).
(3) Uniform buttons (U.S. Army or Corps of Engineers).
(4) Decorations, service medals, service and training ribbons, and other awards and their appurtenances.
(5) Insignia of any design or color that the Army has adopted.
b. Individuals will remove all distinctive items before disposing of unserviceable uniform items."
All that being said, however, there are certain situations under Title 10 Section 772 which allow someone who has been honorably discharged to wear the uniform. You say he was "clearly not in the army." I can only assume this is a reference to his appearance/grooming. Without more details, I would say it's possible he was recently discharged and was "legal" under 772. On the other hand, if this is not the case, then he is in violation of 771 and by extension, 670-1.
